Files
adastra_api/docs/decisions/0007-legacy-routes-removal.md
julien a9ef4cf629 docs(adr): convert all ADRs to MADR 2.1.2 format
Rewrites all 7 backend ADRs from a custom structure to the MADR 2.1.2
template required by the VS Code ADR Manager extension: bullet metadata
(Status/Date), standardised section headings, "Chosen option: X, because Y"
wording, and explicit Pros/Cons blocks per option.
2026-04-26 16:51:22 +02:00

53 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# Remove legacy route directories v1, v2, v3
* Status: proposed
* Date: 2026-04-26
## Context and Problem Statement
The `src/routes/` directory contains three legacy subdirectories (`v1/`, `v2/`, `v3/`) alongside the active `api/` directory. These are backup snapshots of earlier API iterations kept during the migration to the current domain-based structure. They are not mounted in the application. Should they be removed?
## Decision Drivers
* Legacy directories create confusion about which routes are active.
* They add noise to `grep` output and IDE navigation.
* Stale logic risks being accidentally referenced.
## Considered Options
* Remove `v1/`, `v2/`, `v3/` after verification
* Keep them indefinitely
## Decision Outcome
Chosen option: "Remove after verification", because the directories serve no runtime purpose and their presence actively harms codebase clarity.
Before deletion, verify: no active code references them (direct imports or dynamic requires) and their content has been superseded by the equivalent routes under `src/routes/api/`. Verification command: `grep -r "routes/v[123]" src/`.
This ADR is marked *proposed* rather than *accepted* until the verification step is completed and the deletion is committed.
### Positive Consequences
* Cleaner repository — only active routes remain visible.
* Eliminates the risk of accidentally referencing stale logic.
### Negative Consequences
* If any code path still references these directories, removal would cause a runtime error. The verification step mitigates this risk.
## Pros and Cons of the Options
### Remove after verification
* Good, because removes dead code that harms navigability.
* Bad, because irreversible without git history — must verify before deleting.
### Keep indefinitely
* Good, because no risk of breakage.
* Bad, because perpetuates confusion about what is active.
## Links
* Related to [ADR 0004](0004-route-organisation-by-domain.md) — domain-based `api/` structure that replaces these legacy directories.