2 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
julien	7d91da691b	feat(auth): @RequirePrivilege/@RequireRole/@RequireScope guards (ADR-0025) (#208) ... ## Summary Phase 2 of [ADR-0025](docs/decisions/0025-authorization-model-privileges-roles-scopes.md)'s implementation phasing (§"More Information"). The three new route decorators land — `@RequirePrivilege`, `@RequireRole`, `@RequireScope` — alongside the migration of the legacy `@RequireAdmin` to read from `principal.privileges`. Each guard consumes the session-resident `Principal` built by [#206](#206), evaluates its requirement, and either passes or emits a 403 + audit row. The drift-CI gate (phase 3) is **not** in this PR — it lands next, once the catalogue is being referenced from real route handlers. ## What lands ### Shared lib (`libs/shared/auth`) | File | Role | | --- | --- | | `src/lib/principal-matchers.ts` | Pure functions: `principalHasAnyPrivilege` / `principalHasAnyRole` / `principalCoversResource`. The matchers live in the shared lib so the SPA can render UI predicates with the same logic the BFF enforces server-side. | | Same file | `ScopableResource` type — optional FINESS / delegation / region / siege parentage. Callers populate the subset their route resource exposes; the matcher iterates and returns true on the first scope that covers a present field. | | `src/lib/principal-matchers.spec.ts` | 24 unit tests covering OR-composition, the empty-requirement degenerate case (treated as "no constraint" — pass), every scope kind, and the resource-side parentage chain. | ### BFF guards + decorators (`apps/portal-bff/src/auth`) | File | Role | | --- | --- | | `require-privilege.{decorator,guard}.ts` | `@RequirePrivilege('Portal.Admin', ...)` — type-locked to the closed `Privilege` catalogue; multiple values OR-combine. | | `require-role.{decorator,guard}.ts` | `@RequireRole('rh', ...)` — same shape, against `FunctionalRole`. | | `require-scope.{decorator,guard}.ts` | `@RequireScope(req => extractResource(req))` — extractor can be async (Prisma lookup pattern); returning `null` is treated as denial with empty `required[]`. | | `principal-extractor.ts` | Single read of `Principal` off the session, with a legacy-session bridge for principals minted before [#206](#206) landed — filters `user.roles` for `Portal.*` values and synthesises an `unrestricted` scope. After the 12 h absolute-TTL window post-deploy, the bridge becomes dead code. | | `principal-extractor.spec.ts` | 7 tests covering both code paths. | | `require-{privilege,role,scope}.guard.spec.ts` | Unit tests for each guard: 401 on anonymous, 403 + audit on denial, pass on match, generic `forbidden` response body (no role/privilege/resource hint leaks). | | `auth-guards.persona-matrix.spec.ts` | Integration tests: each of the 19 test-tenant personas walked through 5 representative privilege guards + 6 representative role guards. The matrix proves the contracts hold against the real provisioning, not just synthesised principals. | ### Audit module | File | Change | | --- | --- | | `audit.types.ts` | New `AuthorizationDeniedInput` discriminated by `kind: 'privilege' \| 'role' \| 'scope'`. Carries `required[]` and `held[]` arrays so an auditor can pivot on "tried admin while logged in as RH" patterns without joining anything. | | `audit.service.ts` | New `authorizationDenied()` method emitting the `auth.authorization_denied` event type. Distinct from the existing `admin.access_denied` so admin-surface signals stay clean. | | `audit.service.spec.ts` | 3 new tests covering the three `kind` values. | ### Legacy guard migration | File | Change | | --- | --- | | `admin/admin-role.guard.ts` | Reads `principal.privileges` instead of `user.roles`. Public `@RequireAdmin()` API unchanged; `admin.access_denied` event type unchanged. The audit row's `rolesHeld` field now carries `Portal.*` values rather than the raw legacy `roles` claim. | | `admin/admin-role.guard.spec.ts` | Rewritten to exercise `session.principal`-shaped sessions, with a dedicated legacy-bridge sub-suite that asserts pre-ADR-0025 sessions still work. | | `me/me.controller.ts` | `capabilities().canAccessAdmin` reads `principal.privileges` via the same extractor. | | `me/me.controller.spec.ts` | Rewritten against the principal shape. | ### AuthModule wiring | File | Change | | --- | --- | | `auth/auth.module.ts` | Three new guards registered as providers and re-exported. | ## Notes for the reviewer - **Composition semantics.** Within a single decorator, values OR-combine (`@RequireRole('rh', 'comptable')` matches anyone with either). Stacking decorators AND-combines at the Nest level — `@RequireRole('rh') @RequirePrivilege('Portal.Admin')` requires both, because each guard runs separately and a single denial stops the request. The empty-requirement case is rejected at the type level by the tuple `[Privilege, ...Privilege[]]` so a route can not opt out of authorization by passing zero values. - **Why `auth.authorization_denied` and not `admin.access_denied` for the new guards.** ADR-0025 §347 originally said "writes an `admin.access_denied` row", but reusing the `admin.*` namespace would have meant the future `@RequireRole('rh')` on a non-admin HR route ships an event whose type implies an admin surface. The new event type lives in the `auth.*` namespace where the guards live; a `kind` discriminator on the payload tells privilege / role / scope denials apart. The legacy `admin.access_denied` event continues unchanged for `AdminRoleGuard`. - **The legacy-session bridge is short-lived.** After the 12 h absolute-TTL window from this PR's deploy, every session in Redis has a `principal` field and the bridge's `else` branch becomes unreachable. The bridge keeps `@RequireAdmin` + `MeController` functional during that window without needing a forced re-auth campaign. - **Why a `ScopableResource` shape rather than a `Resource | Resource | ...` union per kind.** Routes protect heterogeneous resource types (`Etablissement`, `Dossier`, `Person`), each exposing a different subset of the parentage chain. The optional-field shape lets each route populate what its resource carries and lets the matcher iterate over the principal's scopes once. The cost is that a route author who forgets to populate `delegationCode` on an `Etablissement` resource locks delegation-scoped users out — a typing exercise that the next round of work (concrete consumers) will surface naturally. - **Why `principalCoversResource` deny on doubt.** When a route's extractor returns a resource that lacks the parentage `delegationCode` field, a `delegation:33` scope no longer matches — deny is the safe direction. An over-restrictive deny shows up in the audit log (operator can fix the extractor); an over-permissive pass would silently leak data. The non-transitivity of the parentage chain is an intentional contract. - **Why migrate `MeController` in the same PR.** The `canAccessAdmin` flag reads the same axis (`Portal.Admin` privilege). Leaving it on the legacy `user.roles` shape while everything else moves to `principal.privileges` would create internal inconsistency; a future reviewer would rightfully ask "why?". The migration is three lines plus a spec rewrite. - **The drift-CI gate is the next PR.** ADR-0025 §"More Information" step 3. ESLint custom rule (or a `pnpm run` script) grepping every `@RequirePrivilege('...')` / `@RequireRole('...')` / scope-kind literal in the codebase and asserting each one exists in the catalogue. Now there is something to grep for (the decorators and their tests reference catalogue values), so the gate is well-scoped to land standalone. - **No real consumers of `@RequireScope` yet.** The scope guard ships with a fully exercised contract (extractor signature, async support, audit shape, generic-forbidden body) but no live route. The first consumer surface lands with the `Person` + `User` schema (proposed ADR-0026) and the resource-loading routes that follow. ## Test plan - [x] `pnpm nx affected -t lint test build --base=main` — 3 projects green - `portal-bff`: 741 tests pass (was 497 in #206 — +244 new: matchers/guards/persona-matrix/audit/extractor). - `shared-auth`: 41 tests pass (was 17 in #206 — +24 new matcher tests). - `portal-bff-e2e`: lint green. - [x] `pnpm nx format:check` — clean after `pnpm nx format:write`. - [ ] **Review focus** — the 19-persona matrix (each persona walked through 5 privilege guards + 6 role guards); the legacy-session bridge in `principal-extractor.ts` and its tests; the `admin.access_denied` audit payload now carries `Portal.*` values rather than legacy `roles` (intentional, called out above); the `auth.authorization_denied` event-type rationale. ## What's next Per ADR-0025 §"More Information" phasing: 1. ✅ #206 — types + Principal builder + group-to-role mapping skeleton. 2. ✅ **This PR** — the three new decorators + guards, legacy `@RequireAdmin` migration. 3. **Next PR** — drift CI gate. ESLint custom rule (or `pnpm run` script) that asserts every `@RequireX('...')` literal in code is in the closed catalogue. 4. **Depends on ADR-0026** — `user_scopes` Prisma table + seed + `PrismaScopeResolver` replacing `StubScopeResolver`, then the first concrete consumers of `@RequireScope`. --------- Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr> Reviewed-on: #208	2026-05-23 21:49:34 +02:00
julien	3ed6dae3a5	feat(portal-bff): admin module + role guard + /api/admin/me self-test (#127) ... ## Summary Lays the foundation for the `/api/admin/*` surface per [ADR-0020](docs/decisions/0020-portal-admin-app.md). This PR ships the role guard, the `@RequireAdmin()` decorator, and a self-test endpoint — no business routes yet. The next consumer (audit log viewer) lands in a later PR once the distinct admin session is in place. ## What ships - **[AdminRoleGuard](apps/portal-bff/src/admin/admin-role.guard.ts)** — three branches: - No session at all → **401**. No audit; unauthenticated probes are normal traffic, not a privilege-escalation signal. - Session but `roles` lacks `admin` → **403** + `admin.access_denied` audit row with actor hash, attempted route (`${METHOD} ${originalUrl}`), and the roles the user did hold. - Session with `admin` role → pass through. - Audit-write failures propagate (no audit ⇒ no action, consistent with the existing call sites in [AuthController](apps/portal-bff/src/auth/auth.controller.ts)). - **[`@RequireAdmin()`](apps/portal-bff/src/admin/require-admin.decorator.ts)** — semantic sugar for `@UseGuards(AdminRoleGuard)` built with `applyDecorators` so future composition (e.g. with the upcoming `@RequireMfa({ freshness })` for the admin entry route) is mechanical. - **`GET /api/admin/me`** — self-test endpoint named in ADR-0020 §"Confirmation" step 3. Returns the public user payload + `roles` so ops can `curl` the gate with three sessions (no cookie / non-admin cookie / admin cookie) and observe `401` / `403` + audit / `200` respectively. - **[`AuditWriter.adminAccessDenied()`](apps/portal-bff/src/audit/audit.service.ts)** — new typed method using the pre-existing `denied` outcome enum value. Keeps the salt inside the audit module, matches the pattern of `signIn` / `signOut` / `sessionExpired`. ## Why the shared portal-shell session (for now) ADR-0020 mandates a distinct `__Host-portal_admin_session` cookie + Redis namespace `session:admin:*` for the admin app. **That is not in this PR.** The chantier sequence splits it out: this PR proves the guard semantics + audit integration on the existing session; the next PR introduces the distinct session middleware + admin-specific auth flow. Rationale: the guard logic is independent of the session implementation — `session.user.roles` is the only field it reads. Landing it first means a smaller diff to review, a faster opportunity to validate the audit emission on a real Postgres, and a clean baseline to layer the session split onto. ## Notes for the reviewer - The non-null assertion on `req.session.user!` in [admin.controller.ts:27](apps/portal-bff/src/admin/admin.controller.ts#L27) is explicitly disabled with an inline comment pointing at the guard's contract. The alternative (a defensive runtime check) duplicates the guard's logic without adding safety. The spec for the guard covers every branch including the absent-user path. - `AdminController` does not depend on `AuthService`'s `toPublicUser` projection — that helper is private to the auth module and pulls `displayName` / `username` with extra account-object fallbacks specific to the OIDC callback. The admin response is built from the already-populated session, so a duplicated projection here is the simpler shape. ## Open questions (out of scope) - The Entra app role `admin` must be **declared on the app registration manifest** and **assigned to at least one test user** before this gate can be exercised end-to-end. That's an Entra Admin Center operation, not code. The guard's behaviour under all three branches is covered by unit tests; e2e validation waits until the role is assigned. ## Test plan - [x] `pnpm nx test portal-bff` — **214 specs pass** (was 203; +11 covering guard branches, controller projection, audit method). - [x] `pnpm exec nx affected -t format:check lint test build --base=origin/main` — clean (the pre-existing `_res` / `_next` warnings in `rate-limit.middleware.ts` are unrelated). - [x] Audit row schema verified — `admin.access_denied` events use `outcome=denied`, store the route in `subject`, and persist `{ rolesHeld: [...] }` in the JSONB payload. - [ ] e2e — pending Entra role declaration + assignment. Will be covered by manual ops curl checks once the role exists. --------- Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr> Reviewed-on: #127	2026-05-14 01:17:30 +02:00