apf_portal

julien/apf_portal

Fork 0

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
julien	670f6303fe	docs(adr-0028): accept CI/CD + git hosting migration to GitLab (#227 ) CI / check (push) Successful in 2m0s Details CI / commits (push) Has been skipped Details CI / scan (push) Successful in 2m22s Details CI / a11y (push) Successful in 3m11s Details CI / perf (push) Successful in 6m15s Details Docs site / build (push) Successful in 5m11s Details ## Summary Promotes [ADR-0028](docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md) from `proposed` to `accepted`. Shipped as `proposed` in [#226](#226); no open question left on either drivers, considered options, or the 4-phase migration sequence. Same shape as [#219](#219) (ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 acceptance). Once merged, Phase 1 of the migration (`mirror-and-bootstrap` — repos pushed to GitLab, branch protection / MR templates / deploy keys / Renovate reconfig) is unblocked. ## What lands \| File \| Change \| \| --- \| --- \| \| `docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md` \| Frontmatter `status: proposed → accepted`. \| \| `docs/decisions/0015-cicd-gitea-actions.md` \| Status-update note added at the top, right under the title — calls out that the platform choice "Gitea Actions" is superseded by ADR-0028, while the rest of ADR-0015's architectural principles (trunk-based + squash, all-gates-blocking, thin YAML, on-prem runners, signed commits, Conventional Commits) carry over unchanged. ADR-0015 stays `accepted`. \| \| `docs/decisions/README.md` \| ADR-0028 row: `proposed → accepted`. \| \| `CLAUDE.md` \| Roll-up bumped to `ADRs 0001 → 0028 accepted` with a one-sentence explanation that ADR-0028 supersedes only ADR-0015's platform choice. CI/CD architecture bullet rewritten to reflect the accepted-but-not-yet-implemented state — "Gitea Actions today, migrating to GitLab CE on `vm-gitlab` per ADR-0028 (4-phase rollout in follow-up PRs)". The architectural detail (gates list, thin YAML, signed commits) was preserved; only the platform headline and the act_runner→GitLab Runner line are touched. Also corrected: `ci:scan` (which doesn't exist as a script) → the real script names (`ci:catalogue-drift`, `ci:audit`, `ci:perf`, `ci:gzip-budgets`). \| ## Notes for the reviewer - No new Architecture bullet for ADR-0028 itself. The decision is a platform shift for the existing CI/CD architecture, not a new architectural concern — so it folds into the existing ADR-0015 bullet rather than adding a sibling. - The annotation pattern on ADR-0015 (status-update blockquote at the top) is the canonical MADR way to handle partial supersession without changing the frontmatter status. The architectural principles are still accepted; only the platform implementation moves. A future reader hitting ADR-0015 first sees the redirect immediately. - The CLAUDE.md script-list correction is a side-fix — `ci:scan` is not a real script name; the actual gates are `ci:check`, `ci:catalogue-drift`, `ci:audit`, `ci:commits`, `ci:perf`, `ci:gzip-budgets`. Updated in the same touch since the bullet was being rewritten anyway. - No code changes, so no `pnpm ci:check` impact. `pnpm exec prettier --check` clean on the four touched files. ## Test plan - [x] `pnpm exec prettier --check` — clean on the four touched files. - [x] ADR-0015 → ADR-0028 cross-reference resolves (the new blockquote link). - [x] `ADRs 0001 → 0028 accepted` matches reality (`grep '^status: ' docs/decisions/.md` shows everything below 0029 as `accepted`). - [ ] Review focus* — the ADR-0015 status-update note phrasing, the CLAUDE.md CI/CD bullet rewrite (especially the "carry over" wording), the roll-up sentence about partial supersession. ## What's next (post-merge) 1. Phase 1 — `mirror-and-bootstrap` — `git push --mirror gitlab` for `apf_portal` and the proto vendoring in `apf-ai-service`. GitLab side: groups, projects, branch protection (mirror Gitea's), MR templates, deploy keys, Renovate reconfigured for GitLab. No `.gitlab-ci.yml` yet — Gitea pipelines continue to gate. Ops work primarily; the only PR-shaped output is a Renovate config update on the apf-portal repo if its host detection changes. 2. Phase 2 — `gitlab-ci-pipeline` — `.gitlab-ci.yml` lands alongside `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Both pipelines run in parallel for ~1 calendar week. GitLab Runner registered on `vm-gitlab`. 3. Phase 3 — `cutover` — remotes flip in CLAUDE.md, READMEs, `docs/setup/01-dev-debian-vm-setup.md` §8.3. `.gitea/workflows/` + `infra/ci-runners.compose.yml` deleted, Gitea read-only / archive. 4. Phase 4 — `cleanup` — stale references sweep, required signed-commits on `main` enabled. In parallel — once you've finished walking through the dev VM bootstrap — the paused ADR-0027 PR 1 (Region / Delegation / Structure Prisma schema + inline seed) and ADR-0026 PR 1 (Person / User / UserScope schema + provisioner) can ship on Gitea; they're decoupled from the migration and don't need to wait for it. --------- Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr> Reviewed-on: #227	2026-05-26 10:54:55 +02:00
julien	04ee535de9	docs(adr-0028): propose CI/CD + git hosting migration Gitea -> GitLab (#226 ) CI / check (push) Successful in 3m28s Details CI / commits (push) Has been skipped Details CI / scan (push) Successful in 3m3s Details CI / a11y (push) Successful in 4m21s Details CI / perf (push) Successful in 6m6s Details Docs site / build (push) Successful in 5m59s Details ## Summary Drafts [ADR-0028](docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md) as `proposed`: migrate CI/CD + git hosting from Gitea (`git.unespace.com`) to GitLab CE self-hosted on `vm-gitlab` (`10.100.201.10`). The migration was anticipated by [ADR-0015](docs/decisions/0015-cicd-gitea-actions.md) ("level-2 implementation; will be superseded by a GitLab migration ADR within 6-18 months") — that window opens now. Decision-only PR — the actual 4-phase migration ships across follow-up PRs after acceptance. ADR-0028's number was previously a placeholder reference in ADR-0026 and ADR-0027 for the Pléiades + Acteurs+ sync ADR. Renumbering: that future sync ADR shifts to `ADR-0029`, and the placeholder links in ADR-0026, ADR-0027 and `CLAUDE.md` update to match — included in the same PR so the chain stays consistent. ## What lands \| File \| Change \| \| --- \| --- \| \| `docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md` \| New. MADR 4.0.0 ADR, `proposed`. Decision = Option B (GitLab CE on `vm-gitlab`). Considered options A (status quo Gitea), C (Forgejo), D (cloud SaaS). Documents what carries over from ADR-0015 (architectural principles unchanged — thin YAML, trunk-based, all-gates-blocking, on-prem runners), what changes (host, pipeline file, runner type, scan tooling), the 4-phase migration sequence, and the signed-commits revisit. \| \| `docs/decisions/0026-person-user-portal-data-model.md` \| All 11 `ADR-0028` references → `ADR-0029` (sync + facets shifts to 0029). \| \| `docs/decisions/0027-portal-side-organisational-hierarchy.md` \| All 14 `ADR-0028` references → `ADR-0029`. \| \| `docs/decisions/README.md` \| New row for ADR-0028 (`proposed`, tags `infrastructure`, `process`, 2026-05-26). \| \| `CLAUDE.md` \| Roll-up updated: `ADRs 0001 → 0027 accepted; ADR-0028 + ADR-0029 proposed`. ADR-0028's relationship to ADR-0015 spelled out inline ("supersedes ADR-0015's Gitea Actions platform choice — the rest of ADR-0015's architectural principles carry over unchanged"). ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 architecture bullets renumbered 0028 → 0029 to track. \| ## Key choices in the ADR - What carries over from ADR-0015 vs what changes — explicit table so future readers see immediately that the migration is platform-only, not a re-litigation of CI principles. Trunk-based + squash, all-gates-blocking, thin YAML over portable scripts (`pnpm ci:check` etc. — unchanged), on-prem runners, Conventional Commits in CI + hook (defense in depth) — all carried over. Host, pipeline-file grammar, runner type, and scan tooling are the only things that move. - Native security scanning replaces the manual Trivy + gitleaks setup. GitLab CE's built-in `Dependency-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml` + `Secret-Detection.gitlab-ci.yml` includes consolidate the ~30 lines of inline `curl + tar` install dance currently in `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Same blocking thresholds (CRITICAL+HIGH dependency vulns, any secret). - `vm-gitlab` is already provisioned. No infra wait — the only sequencing constraint is operator-driven, not infrastructure-driven. - 4-phase migration, parallel pipelines for ~1 week before cutover. Phase 1 mirrors repos and bootstraps GitLab side (no `.gitlab-ci.yml` yet — Gitea still gates). Phase 2 lands `.gitlab-ci.yml` alongside `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml` so both pipelines run per PR until parity is confirmed. Phase 3 flips the remote URLs and deletes `.gitea/workflows/` + `infra/ci-runners.compose.yml`. Phase 4 sweeps stale references. - Gitea moves to read-only / archive, not decommissioned at cutover. Existing references to Gitea PRs (`#213`, `#217`, `#219`, …) in commit messages and ADR bodies stay resolvable as historical artefacts. One VM at idle is a low long-term cost. - Signed commits revisit. ADR-0015 noted "signed commits recommended, revisited at GitLab migration". ADR-0028 makes the recommendation: enable required signed commits on `main` once GitLab is live, paired with GnuPG agent forwarding (already documented in `docs/setup/01-dev-debian-vm-setup.md` §8.5). `apf-portal-bot` (Renovate) gets a dedicated signing key at PR 1. ## Renumbering — what moved and why Before this PR, ADR-0026 and ADR-0027 used `ADR-0028` as a placeholder link for the Pléiades + Acteurs+ sync ADR. That sync ADR hasn't been drafted yet — the number was reserved. This PR claims `ADR-0028` for the GitLab migration (the immediately-actionable decision), and shifts the sync placeholder to ADR-0029. All 25 link references across ADR-0026 (11) and ADR-0027 (14) update in lockstep — replace_all is safe here because in those files `ADR-0028` consistently meant "the sync ADR". Content of the sync ADR is unchanged — only the number. When that ADR is eventually drafted as `0029-…md`, it gets the existing content reserved for it in the placeholder text. ## Test plan - [x] `pnpm exec prettier --check` clean on the touched files. - [x] All `ADR-0028` references in `0026-…md` / `0027-…md` / `CLAUDE.md` now read `ADR-0029` (grep confirms zero remaining references to the old number in those files). - [x] The new `0028-…md` self-references (status frontmatter, title, internal anchors) are consistent — no leftover `0029`. - [ ] Review focus — drivers / consequences / migration sequence in the ADR; the "what carries over from ADR-0015" table; the renumbering rationale. ## What's next Per ADR-0028 §"Migration sequence", post-acceptance: 1. ADR-0028 acceptance PR — small status-flip, same pattern as #219 (ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 acceptance). 2. `mirror-and-bootstrap` PR — `git push --mirror` Gitea → GitLab; GitLab side groups / projects / branch protection / MR templates / deploy keys / Renovate reconfig. No `.gitlab-ci.yml` yet, Gitea pipelines still gate. 3. `gitlab-ci-pipeline` PR — `.gitlab-ci.yml` alongside the existing `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Parallel runs ~1 week for parity. GitLab Runner registered on `vm-gitlab`. 4. `cutover` PR — remotes flip across docs, `.gitea/workflows/` + `infra/ci-runners.compose.yml` deleted, Gitea read-only. 5. `cleanup` PR — stale references sweep, signed-commit policy finalised on `main`. In parallel — once the dev VM (#220 / #221 / #222 / #223 / #224) is fully bootstrapped — the paused ADR-0027 PR 1 (Region / Delegation / Structure Prisma schema + inline seed) and ADR-0026 PR 1 (Person / User / UserScope schema + provisioner) can ship on Gitea; they have no dependency on the GitLab migration and don't need to wait. --------- Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr> Reviewed-on: #226	2026-05-26 10:30:19 +02:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

julien

670f6303fe

docs(adr-0028): accept CI/CD + git hosting migration to GitLab (#227 )

CI / check (push) Successful in 2m0s

Details

CI / commits (push) Has been skipped

Details

CI / scan (push) Successful in 2m22s

Details

CI / a11y (push) Successful in 3m11s

Details

CI / perf (push) Successful in 6m15s

Details

Docs site / build (push) Successful in 5m11s

Details

## Summary

Promotes [ADR-0028](docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md) from `proposed` to `accepted`. Shipped as `proposed` in [#226](#226); no open question left on either drivers, considered options, or the 4-phase migration sequence. Same shape as [#219](#219) (ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 acceptance).

Once merged, **Phase 1** of the migration (`mirror-and-bootstrap` — repos pushed to GitLab, branch protection / MR templates / deploy keys / Renovate reconfig) is unblocked.

## What lands

| File | Change |
| --- | --- |
| `docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md` | Frontmatter `status: proposed → accepted`. |
| `docs/decisions/0015-cicd-gitea-actions.md` | **Status-update note** added at the top, right under the title — calls out that the platform choice "Gitea Actions" is superseded by ADR-0028, while the rest of ADR-0015's architectural principles (trunk-based + squash, all-gates-blocking, thin YAML, on-prem runners, signed commits, Conventional Commits) carry over unchanged. ADR-0015 stays `accepted`. |
| `docs/decisions/README.md` | ADR-0028 row: `proposed → accepted`. |
| `CLAUDE.md` | Roll-up bumped to `ADRs 0001 → 0028 accepted` with a one-sentence explanation that ADR-0028 supersedes only ADR-0015's platform choice. **CI/CD architecture bullet rewritten** to reflect the accepted-but-not-yet-implemented state — "Gitea Actions today, migrating to GitLab CE on `vm-gitlab` per ADR-0028 (4-phase rollout in follow-up PRs)". The architectural detail (gates list, thin YAML, signed commits) was preserved; only the platform headline and the act_runner→GitLab Runner line are touched. Also corrected: `ci:scan` (which doesn't exist as a script) → the real script names (`ci:catalogue-drift`, `ci:audit`, `ci:perf`, `ci:gzip-budgets`). |

## Notes for the reviewer

- **No new Architecture bullet for ADR-0028 itself.** The decision is a *platform shift* for the existing CI/CD architecture, not a new architectural concern — so it folds into the existing ADR-0015 bullet rather than adding a sibling.
- **The annotation pattern on ADR-0015** (status-update blockquote at the top) is the canonical MADR way to handle partial supersession without changing the frontmatter status. The architectural principles are still accepted; only the platform implementation moves. A future reader hitting ADR-0015 first sees the redirect immediately.
- **The CLAUDE.md script-list correction** is a side-fix — `ci:scan` is not a real script name; the actual gates are `ci:check`, `ci:catalogue-drift`, `ci:audit`, `ci:commits`, `ci:perf`, `ci:gzip-budgets`. Updated in the same touch since the bullet was being rewritten anyway.
- **No code changes**, so no `pnpm ci:check` impact. `pnpm exec prettier --check` clean on the four touched files.

## Test plan

- [x] `pnpm exec prettier --check` — clean on the four touched files.
- [x] ADR-0015 → ADR-0028 cross-reference resolves (the new blockquote link).
- [x] `ADRs 0001 → 0028 accepted` matches reality (`grep '^status: ' docs/decisions/*.md` shows everything below 0029 as `accepted`).
- [ ] **Review focus** — the ADR-0015 status-update note phrasing, the CLAUDE.md CI/CD bullet rewrite (especially the "carry over" wording), the roll-up sentence about partial supersession.

## What's next (post-merge)

1. **Phase 1 — `mirror-and-bootstrap`** — `git push --mirror gitlab` for `apf_portal` and the proto vendoring in `apf-ai-service`. GitLab side: groups, projects, branch protection (mirror Gitea's), MR templates, deploy keys, Renovate reconfigured for GitLab. **No `.gitlab-ci.yml` yet** — Gitea pipelines continue to gate. Ops work primarily; the only PR-shaped output is a Renovate config update on the apf-portal repo if its host detection changes.
2. **Phase 2 — `gitlab-ci-pipeline`** — `.gitlab-ci.yml` lands alongside `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Both pipelines run in parallel for ~1 calendar week. GitLab Runner registered on `vm-gitlab`.
3. **Phase 3 — `cutover`** — remotes flip in CLAUDE.md, READMEs, `docs/setup/01-dev-debian-vm-setup.md` §8.3. `.gitea/workflows/` + `infra/ci-runners.compose.yml` deleted, Gitea read-only / archive.
4. **Phase 4 — `cleanup`** — stale references sweep, required signed-commits on `main` enabled.

In parallel — once you've finished walking through the dev VM bootstrap — the paused **ADR-0027 PR 1** (Region / Delegation / Structure Prisma schema + inline seed) and **ADR-0026 PR 1** (Person / User / UserScope schema + provisioner) can ship on Gitea; they're decoupled from the migration and don't need to wait for it.

---------

Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr>
Reviewed-on: #227

2026-05-26 10:54:55 +02:00

julien

04ee535de9

docs(adr-0028): propose CI/CD + git hosting migration Gitea -> GitLab (#226 )

CI / check (push) Successful in 3m28s

Details

CI / commits (push) Has been skipped

Details

CI / scan (push) Successful in 3m3s

Details

CI / a11y (push) Successful in 4m21s

Details

CI / perf (push) Successful in 6m6s

Details

Docs site / build (push) Successful in 5m59s

Details

## Summary

Drafts [ADR-0028](docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md) as `proposed`: migrate CI/CD + git hosting from Gitea (`git.unespace.com`) to GitLab CE self-hosted on `vm-gitlab` (`10.100.201.10`). The migration was anticipated by [ADR-0015](docs/decisions/0015-cicd-gitea-actions.md) ("level-2 implementation; will be superseded by a GitLab migration ADR within 6-18 months") — that window opens now. **Decision-only PR** — the actual 4-phase migration ships across follow-up PRs after acceptance.

ADR-0028's number was previously a placeholder reference in ADR-0026 and ADR-0027 for the Pléiades + Acteurs+ sync ADR. **Renumbering**: that future sync ADR shifts to `ADR-0029`, and the placeholder links in ADR-0026, ADR-0027 and `CLAUDE.md` update to match — included in the same PR so the chain stays consistent.

## What lands

| File | Change |
| --- | --- |
| `docs/decisions/0028-migrate-cicd-and-git-hosting-to-gitlab.md` | **New.** MADR 4.0.0 ADR, `proposed`. Decision = Option B (GitLab CE on `vm-gitlab`). Considered options A (status quo Gitea), C (Forgejo), D (cloud SaaS). Documents what carries over from ADR-0015 (architectural principles unchanged — thin YAML, trunk-based, all-gates-blocking, on-prem runners), what changes (host, pipeline file, runner type, scan tooling), the 4-phase migration sequence, and the signed-commits revisit. |
| `docs/decisions/0026-person-user-portal-data-model.md` | All 11 `ADR-0028` references → `ADR-0029` (sync + facets shifts to 0029). |
| `docs/decisions/0027-portal-side-organisational-hierarchy.md` | All 14 `ADR-0028` references → `ADR-0029`. |
| `docs/decisions/README.md` | New row for ADR-0028 (`proposed`, tags `infrastructure`, `process`, 2026-05-26). |
| `CLAUDE.md` | Roll-up updated: `ADRs 0001 → 0027 accepted; ADR-0028 + ADR-0029 proposed`. ADR-0028's relationship to ADR-0015 spelled out inline ("supersedes ADR-0015's Gitea Actions platform choice — the rest of ADR-0015's architectural principles carry over unchanged"). ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 architecture bullets renumbered 0028 → 0029 to track. |

## Key choices in the ADR

- **What carries over from ADR-0015 vs what changes** — explicit table so future readers see immediately that the migration is **platform-only**, not a re-litigation of CI principles. Trunk-based + squash, all-gates-blocking, thin YAML over portable scripts (`pnpm ci:check` etc. — unchanged), on-prem runners, Conventional Commits in CI + hook (defense in depth) — all carried over. Host, pipeline-file grammar, runner type, and scan tooling are the only things that move.
- **Native security scanning replaces the manual Trivy + gitleaks setup.** GitLab CE's built-in `Dependency-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml` + `Secret-Detection.gitlab-ci.yml` includes consolidate the ~30 lines of inline `curl + tar` install dance currently in `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Same blocking thresholds (CRITICAL+HIGH dependency vulns, any secret).
- **`vm-gitlab` is already provisioned.** No infra wait — the only sequencing constraint is operator-driven, not infrastructure-driven.
- **4-phase migration, parallel pipelines for ~1 week before cutover.** Phase 1 mirrors repos and bootstraps GitLab side (no `.gitlab-ci.yml` yet — Gitea still gates). Phase 2 lands `.gitlab-ci.yml` alongside `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml` so both pipelines run per PR until parity is confirmed. Phase 3 flips the remote URLs and deletes `.gitea/workflows/` + `infra/ci-runners.compose.yml`. Phase 4 sweeps stale references.
- **Gitea moves to read-only / archive, not decommissioned** at cutover. Existing references to Gitea PRs (`#213`, `#217`, `#219`, …) in commit messages and ADR bodies stay resolvable as historical artefacts. One VM at idle is a low long-term cost.
- **Signed commits revisit.** ADR-0015 noted "signed commits recommended, revisited at GitLab migration". ADR-0028 makes the recommendation: enable required signed commits on `main` once GitLab is live, paired with GnuPG agent forwarding (already documented in `docs/setup/01-dev-debian-vm-setup.md` §8.5). `apf-portal-bot` (Renovate) gets a dedicated signing key at PR 1.

## Renumbering — what moved and why

Before this PR, ADR-0026 and ADR-0027 used `ADR-0028` as a placeholder link for the Pléiades + Acteurs+ sync ADR. That sync ADR hasn't been drafted yet — the number was reserved.

This PR claims `ADR-0028` for the GitLab migration (the immediately-actionable decision), and shifts the sync placeholder to **ADR-0029**. All 25 link references across ADR-0026 (11) and ADR-0027 (14) update in lockstep — replace_all is safe here because in those files `ADR-0028` consistently meant "the sync ADR".

Content of the sync ADR is unchanged — only the number. When that ADR is eventually drafted as `0029-…md`, it gets the existing content reserved for it in the placeholder text.

## Test plan

- [x] `pnpm exec prettier --check` clean on the touched files.
- [x] All `ADR-0028` references in `0026-…md` / `0027-…md` / `CLAUDE.md` now read `ADR-0029` (grep confirms zero remaining references to the old number in those files).
- [x] The new `0028-…md` self-references (status frontmatter, title, internal anchors) are consistent — no leftover `0029`.
- [ ] **Review focus** — drivers / consequences / migration sequence in the ADR; the "what carries over from ADR-0015" table; the renumbering rationale.

## What's next

Per ADR-0028 §"Migration sequence", post-acceptance:

1. **ADR-0028 acceptance PR** — small status-flip, same pattern as #219 (ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 acceptance).
2. **`mirror-and-bootstrap` PR** — `git push --mirror` Gitea → GitLab; GitLab side groups / projects / branch protection / MR templates / deploy keys / Renovate reconfig. No `.gitlab-ci.yml` yet, Gitea pipelines still gate.
3. **`gitlab-ci-pipeline` PR** — `.gitlab-ci.yml` alongside the existing `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Parallel runs ~1 week for parity. GitLab Runner registered on `vm-gitlab`.
4. **`cutover` PR** — remotes flip across docs, `.gitea/workflows/` + `infra/ci-runners.compose.yml` deleted, Gitea read-only.
5. **`cleanup` PR** — stale references sweep, signed-commit policy finalised on `main`.

In parallel — once the dev VM (#220 / #221 / #222 / #223 / #224) is fully bootstrapped — the paused **ADR-0027 PR 1** (Region / Delegation / Structure Prisma schema + inline seed) and **ADR-0026 PR 1** (Person / User / UserScope schema + provisioner) can ship on Gitea; they have no dependency on the GitLab migration and don't need to wait.

---------

Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr>
Reviewed-on: #226

2026-05-26 10:30:19 +02:00

2 Commits