docs(adr): split ADR-0026 + propose ADR-0027 (Structure hierarchy) (#217)

## Summary

Splits [ADR-0026](docs/decisions/0026-person-user-portal-data-model.md) into two sibling ADRs after a cascade / acteurs_plus source-of-truth audit caught a design break: the first draft pinned `Etablissement.finess` as primary key, but ≥ 30 % of APF's real structure inventory has no FINESS (antennes, dispositifs, entreprises adaptées, mouvement, administratif, siège).

| ADR | Status | Scope |
| --- | --- | --- |
| [ADR-0026](docs/decisions/0026-person-user-portal-data-model.md) — narrowed | `proposed` | `Person` + `User` + `UserScope` only (identity model) |
| [ADR-0027](docs/decisions/0027-portal-side-organisational-hierarchy.md) — new | `proposed` | `Region` + `Delegation` + `Structure` (cascade-aligned: `kind` discriminator + nullable FINESS / SIRET / `codePaie`) |
| `ADR-0028` (future) | — | Pléiades + Acteurs+ + cascade syncs + facet schemas (renumbered from the old `ADR-0027` placeholder) |

No code changes — all three artefacts moving in this PR are markdown.

## What lands

| File | Change |
| --- | --- |
| `docs/decisions/0026-person-user-portal-data-model.md` | Title trimmed (drop `+ organisational hierarchy`); `Region` / `Delegation` / `Etablissement` schema removed; `Person.email` unique constraint dropped (two distinct humans can share an email — see Lifecycle); Lifecycle rewritten without email-based dedup; `UserScope.value` documented as opaque string referencing ADR-0027 codes; Confirmation drops `Etablissement.kind` bullet; ADR-0027 sync references renumbered to ADR-0028; "What ADR-0026 ships vs adjacent ADRs" rewritten to three columns. |
| `docs/decisions/0027-portal-side-organisational-hierarchy.md` | **New.** Decision = Option B (`Structure` with `kind` discriminator + nullable FINESS / SIRET / `codePaie`, internal `code` PK that doubles as FINESS for medico-social structures). Considered options A (FINESS-only — original ADR-0026 draft), B (chosen), C (full cascade replication), D (remote read against cascade). Inline-migration seed for the test tenant (Region 75 + Delegation 33 + a handful of medico-social structures + `siege`); full inventory deferred to ADR-0028's cascade sync. `Structure.kind` enum-as-string drift-gated. |
| `docs/decisions/README.md` | ADR-0026 row: title updated, status stays `proposed`. New ADR-0027 row: `proposed`, tags `data, backend`. |
| `CLAUDE.md` | Roll-up clarifies: `0001 → 0025 accepted`; `ADR-0026 + ADR-0027 proposed`. `@RequireScope` Prisma-resolver roadmap entry references both ADRs + the ADR-0028 follow-up. No new Architecture bullet (entries land when their ADRs ship). |

## Why split

The cascade audit was the trigger. Cascade — APF's medico-social structure registry + Pléiades/Talentia HR integration — models `Structure` with a **seven-value type discriminator**: `medico_social`, `antenne`, `dispositif`, `entreprise_adaptee`, `mouvement`, `administratif`, `sanitaire`. Three of those (`antenne`, `dispositif`, part of `entreprise_adaptee`) **do not have a FINESS** by construction. Cascade carries FINESS / SIRET / SIREN / Pléiades `codePaie` / Talentia `codeCompta` on **separate per-source enrichment rows** (`StructureSourceFiness`, `StructureSourceSirene`, `StructureSourcePleiades`, `StructureSourceTalentia`), nullable and many-to-one against `Structure`.

The acteurs_plus audit confirmed: acteurs_plus does not store FINESS / SIRET / SIREN on its hierarchy entities at all — it uses a portal-internal `code` (unique string) + an `externalId` pointer.

The first ADR-0026 draft's `Etablissement.finess` PK excluded all non-medico-social structures by construction. The fix is **not** to make FINESS nullable on `Etablissement` (that smuggles the discriminator into absence-of-value semantics) — it is to adopt cascade's `Structure` + `kind` discriminator directly. Doing that inside ADR-0026 would have ballooned its scope; splitting is the cleaner shape:

- **ADR-0026** keeps a tight focus on identity (`Person` + `User` + `UserScope`). The Person model is unchanged from the first draft except for the email-dedup rewrite (already discussed before the audit landed).
- **ADR-0027** owns the org hierarchy with the cascade-aligned schema, the seeding posture, and the deferred parts (`Pole`, `Service`, arbitrary nesting, per-source enrichment) called out explicitly as ADR-0028's territory.

## ADR-0027 schema highlights

```prisma
model Structure {
  // Portal-internal stable code. For medico-social structures we set
  // code = FINESS (round-trips through scope literals + URLs cleanly).
  // For non-medico-social structures: APF-internal slug ('siege',
  // 'apf-bdx-merignac', 'ea-toulouse', 'mvt-national', …).
  code            String   @id
  name            String
  // Aligned with cascade's Structure.type discriminator. Drift-gated.
  kind            String   // 'medico_social' | 'antenne' | 'dispositif'
                           // | 'entreprise_adaptee' | 'mouvement'
                           // | 'administratif' | 'siege'
  finess          String?  @unique  // 9 digits, NULL for non-medico-social
  siret           String?  @unique  // 14 chars, NULL when not SIRENE-registered
  codePaie        String?  @unique  // Pléiades 6-char, NULL in v1
  delegationCode  String?           // NULL for siège, mouvement national
  delegation      Delegation? @relation(fields: [delegationCode], references: [code])
  @@index([kind])
  @@index([delegationCode])
}
```

The vocabulary mismatch — ADR-0025's scope kind name is `etablissement` but the value is now a `Structure.code` of any kind — is documented as a known wart, with a possible ADR-0025 amendment as the rename path if a maintainer trips over it.

## Notes for the reviewer

- **`Person.email` unique constraint dropped.** Two distinct humans genuinely can share an email (shared family alias, generic `info@` mailbox, error in an upstream feed). The first draft had `email String? @unique` carried over from a "let's use it as a v1 dedup key" line of thinking that the audit reshaped. The lifecycle now treats `entraOid` as the only natural key the v1 provisioner trusts; email is an attribute, indexed for operator-driven lookup (admin UI search, ADR-0028 reconciliation flow), not a constraint.
- **`UserScope.value` has no FK to ADR-0027 tables.** Deliberate: a scope can outlive its target (a structure decommissioned mid-quarter still has historical UserScope rows pointing at its code, which the audit log needs to read). Admin UI write path validates; runtime guard tolerates stale codes (they fail the resource match, not the sign-in).
- **The old open PR `docs/adr-0026-accept-and-tighten-lifecycle` is superseded by this one.** That branch promoted ADR-0026 (full first draft) to `accepted`. The Q1 / Q2 resolutions from that PR are preserved here — Q1 (no email-dedup) is the new ADR-0026 Lifecycle section; Q2 (inline-migration seed) moves to ADR-0027's "Seeding posture" section since it is org-hierarchy-specific. The old PR can be closed without merging.
- **No code changes**, so no `pnpm ci:check` impact. `pnpm exec prettier --check` clean on the four touched files.

## Test plan

- [x] `pnpm exec prettier --check` — clean on the four touched files.
- [x] ADR cross-references resolve (every `ADR-NNNN` link in the two ADRs round-trips; the new ADR-0028 reference is a known dangling marker for the future sync ADR).
- [ ] **Review focus** — cascade / acteurs_plus audit findings as cited in ADR-0027 §"Context"; the schema choices in ADR-0027 (kind enum, nullable FINESS/SIRET, internal `code` PK); the `Person.email` non-unique change in ADR-0026; the scope-kind vocabulary mismatch documented in ADR-0027.

## What's next (post-merge)

Per ADR-0026 §"Phasing" and ADR-0027 §"Phasing" — the two ADR PRs ship in parallel once accepted:

1. **ADR-0027 Implementation PR 1** — `Region` / `Delegation` / `Structure` Prisma schema + inline reference-data migration + `Structure.kind` catalogue + drift-gate extension.
2. **ADR-0026 Implementation PR 1** — `Person` / `User` / `UserScope` Prisma schema + `PersonAndUserProvisioner` called from `SessionEstablisher` + `Person.source` catalogue + drift-gate extension + updated `PrincipalBuilder`. Independent of (1) at the schema level — can ship in parallel.
3. **ADR-0026 Implementation PR 2** — `PrismaScopeResolver` replacing `StubScopeResolver` + `/admin/users/:id/scopes` admin screen + `prisma/seed.ts` populating the 19 test personas' `user_scopes` per `notes/test-tenant-role-assignments.md`. **Depends on both (1) and (2)** — the seed references `Structure.code` values from (1) and writes `UserScope` rows from (2).
4. **ADR-0028 (proposed)** — Pléiades + Acteurs+ + cascade syncs + facet schemas (Salarié / Élu / Adhérent / Bénévole / Bénéficiaire / PartenaireExterne) + operator-confirmed Person-reconciliation flow + schema extensions (`Pole`, `Service`, per-source enrichment) the sync needs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Julien Gautier <julien.gautier@apf.asso.fr>
Reviewed-on: #217

CLAUDE.md

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ The structural, security, observability, and quality choices are recorded as ADR
 
 The Nx workspace is **scaffolded and operational**. The three apps (`portal-shell`, `portal-admin`, `portal-bff`) and the seven lib roots (`libs/feature/auth`, `libs/shared/auth`, `libs/shared/charts`, `libs/shared/state`, `libs/shared/tokens`, `libs/shared/ui`, `libs/shared/util`) are in place; CI runs `format:check / lint / test / build` plus the ADR-0025 catalogue-drift gate on every PR.
 
-ADRs 0001 → 0025 are accepted and cover the structural, security, observability, quality, i18n, admin-app, docs-site, charts, AI-relay, and authorization choices. **Shipped on `main`:**
+ADRs 0001 → 0025 are accepted and cover the structural, security, observability, quality, i18n, admin-app, docs-site, charts, AI-relay, and authorization choices. ADR-0026 (portal-side identity model — `Person` + `User` + `UserScope`) and ADR-0027 (portal-side organisational hierarchy — `Structure` with kind discriminator + nullable FINESS / SIRET, cascade-aligned) are proposed; together they unlock the ADR-0025 stubs (`Principal.user.{id, personId}` placeholders, `StubScopeResolver`'s `unrestricted` blanket return). **Shipped on `main`:**
 
 - **Phase-1 foundation** — Nx workspace, Angular `portal-shell`, NestJS `portal-bff`, Prisma + Postgres, Pino + OpenTelemetry, Husky/lint-staged/commitlint, Gitea Actions CI.
 - **Phase-2 auth + audit + security** — OIDC Auth Code + PKCE via MSAL Node, Redis sessions with AES-256-GCM at rest, idle 30 min sliding + absolute 12 h hard ceiling, RP-initiated logout, double-submit CSRF, `audit.events` append-only schema with role-based grants, helmet + env-driven CORS allowlist + rate limiting + structured error envelope (see [ADR-0021](docs/decisions/0021-phase-2-security-baseline.md)).
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ ADRs 0001 → 0025 are accepted and cover the structural, security, observabilit
 
 - `DownstreamApiClient` + OBO ([ADR-0014](docs/decisions/0014-downstream-api-access-obo-pattern.md)) — module scaffolded (`obo.strategy`, `signed-assertion.strategy`, JWKS publisher, encrypted token cache); no v1 consumer yet. Wires in when the first business route needs an Entra-protected API.
 - `@RequireMfa()` step-up consumer routes ([ADR-0011](docs/decisions/0011-mfa-enforcement-entra-conditional-access.md)) — guard + decorator shipped; awaiting first sensitive route that needs explicit freshness enforcement beyond the Conditional Access baseline.
-- **`@RequireScope` Prisma-backed resolver + first consumer surface** — `StubScopeResolver` returns `unrestricted` for everyone in v1 per [ADR-0025](docs/decisions/0025-authorization-model-privileges-roles-scopes.md) §331. The real implementation lands with ADR-0026 (proposed: `Person` golden record + portal-side `User` + `user_scopes` table); the first scope-aware route surface follows in the same PR family.
+- **`@RequireScope` Prisma-backed resolver + first consumer surface** — `StubScopeResolver` returns `unrestricted` for everyone in v1 per [ADR-0025](docs/decisions/0025-authorization-model-privileges-roles-scopes.md) §331. Real implementation lands across [ADR-0026](docs/decisions/0026-person-user-portal-data-model.md) (proposed: `Person` + `User` + `UserScope`) and [ADR-0027](docs/decisions/0027-portal-side-organisational-hierarchy.md) (proposed: `Region` / `Delegation` / `Structure` with `kind` discriminator + nullable FINESS / SIRET). Sequencing: ADR-0026 PR 1 + ADR-0027 PR 1 ship schema in parallel; ADR-0026 PR 2 then lands the `PrismaScopeResolver` + admin scope-seeding UI + test-tenant seed (which references ADR-0027's `Structure.code` values). The follow-up [ADR-0028](#) covers Pléiades / Acteurs+ / cascade syncs + facet schemas.
 - **Proto-drift CI gate for the AI relay** ([ADR-0024](docs/decisions/0024-ai-service-relay-grpc-sse-bridge.md)) — asserts the vendored `apf-ai-service` proto files stay in lockstep with the upstream contract.
 - **Admin app — CMS & menu management** ([ADR-0020](docs/decisions/0020-portal-admin-app.md)) — multilingual static-page editor + navigation menu builder. The user-list + audit-log-viewer modules already exist; the CMS/menu pair is the remaining v1 module scope.
 - **Strategic security baseline ADR** — separate from the implementation-level [ADR-0021](docs/decisions/0021-phase-2-security-baseline.md). Remains **paused** awaiting RSSI input on the OWASP ASVS reference level and adjacent frameworks (HDS, GDPR, possibly NIS 2). When it lands it will either confirm 0021 or supersede pieces of it.