Add 12 ADRs documenting frontend architecture decisions
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
# ADR 0003: Dual UI Library — Progressive Migration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-04-26
|
||||
**Status:** Accepted (transitional)
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
The application currently uses two UI libraries simultaneously:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Angular Material** — component library (buttons, dialogs, tables, forms, etc.)
|
||||
- **Bootstrap 5** — layout utilities, typography, spacing, and some components
|
||||
|
||||
This coexistence is a legacy of a progressive migration: Bootstrap was the original styling layer, and Angular Material was introduced incrementally. Maintaining both libraries increases bundle size, creates styling inconsistencies, and adds cognitive overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Accept the dual-library state as a transitional phase. The long-term goal is to consolidate to a single UI library. Neither Angular Material nor Bootstrap is guaranteed to be the final choice — the decision will be made when consolidation is actively prioritised, potentially in favour of a different library altogether.
|
||||
|
||||
In the meantime:
|
||||
|
||||
- Angular Material handles interactive components (dialogs, forms, navigation).
|
||||
- Bootstrap handles layout (grid, spacing utilities) and fills gaps where Material has no equivalent.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- **Positive:** No big-bang UI rewrite required at this stage.
|
||||
- **Negative:** Two styling systems in tension. Bootstrap's `@import`-based Sass is incompatible with the `@use` module system; Dart Sass deprecation warnings are silenced in `angular.json` as a workaround (see ADR 0012).
|
||||
- **Future action:** When consolidation is prioritised, evaluate the available options (Material 3, PrimeNG, Spartan/shadcn-angular, or custom) and supersede this ADR.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user